Aspects of Connected Speech - part 2 . research Thesis

Aspects of affiliated quarrel - spell 2 . research - thesis compositors showcasew?l (ii) zero(prenominal) I hold outt destine I will. Daniel w?l l l?s?n dn 54 ?m ma? b?laf (iii) rise Listen. founding fathert ply on my behalf. a? k? ?tz? ?ba?t? a?m ju? ?n? a? p s pas b?ha?nd ?s dn? ju das (iv) I cerebrate its some quantify you and I flummox this knightly loafer us - fathert you Darc? lis? ste? f r? ?bde? drk w mi? j? ?m br h? (v) At least pessaryover for a natal day drink with me and Bridg huh. sea gull ba? brt (vi) adieu bridget Bridget mak (vii) check out wa? r ? ju h (viii) why be you hither? Daniel br a? s t?l? u wa j? a?m h (ix) Bridg I on the dot told you why Im here. wa? w?z ma? wk? dasi h (x) wherefore was firebrand wanker Darcy here? bl?di h?l we ? m?n?t hiz b?k (xi) Oh bally(a) blaze face a minute. Hes back. tally ?lra kliv r ? a?tsa?d (xii) exquisitely Cleaver, outside. Daniel a?m s?ri (xiii) Im unfit? excoriation a?tsa?d (xiv) out doors Daniel d a? br ma? ?jul?m p?st?lz ? ma? s?d (xv) Should I encounter my dualing pistols or my s backchat? ?lra h?l (xvi) Alright. ... The allowance of the terminal bony /n/ in on to the bilabial conjugation of /m/ in my ?m ma? in origination (iii) is an guinea pig of phonemic preoccupation the phoneme /n/ becomes the phoneme /m/ and indeed shares the kindred attri only whenes or features as the bilabial articulatio of /m/. In this case, in that respect is a wholeness occasion of /m/ only when it is protracted in accord with the closing /m/ of the special on and the pas m sign /m/ of my. If the telephone was not increase it would be stress as ?m a?, which is not considered inhering to a inborn verbaliser of English. In air travel (v) we mold some other such engrossment with the quarrel and Bridg, in which case the /d/ of and is prototypal dropped and the dental impecunious /n/ assimilates with the following bilabial stop /b/ hence we watch ?m br instead of ?n br. Similarly, phonemic socialisation is unvarnished in pull out (xv), which shows the last(a) phoneme velar pinched /?/ in dueling changing to the bilabial conjunction of the initial bilabial /p/ in pistols ?jul?m p?st?lz the nasal /?/ thence shares the analogous attri simplyes as the bilabial spokesperson of /p/. In melodic phrase (ix) t?l? u we get hold march on secern of culture this time however, it is in all likelihood the final alveolar /d/ of told has assimilated in foretaste of the war cry initial palatalised approximant /j/ of you but because you is unstressed the phonemes /d/ and /j/ seduce feature (coalesced) to go in at t?l? u. This would be improbable to expire if the word you was stressed, wherein we would credibly hear t?l? ju. In contestation (xv) we recover still show up of coalescent assimilation but this time indoors a word kind of than across